Terrence Malick’s Days of Heaven is a wonderfully colorful tapestry. It flows from shot to shot, scene to scene, in the carefree yet persistent manner of the wind, the river, the rain and other elemental entities represented in the film. Days of Heaven is an uplifting, even hopeful film — despite the tragedy of the main characters — in its portrayal of a time in America (at least in Malick’s interpretation) when people carried a humanistic pride in themselves.
The optimistic hopes and dreams of the characters is an integral part of Days of Heaven. The people of the film each have hopes for their lives, but it would seem that none of them have come true — even for the rich wheat farmer (Sam Shepard) with his huge land holdings and incongruously ornate house on the Texas plains. The farmer was unaware of his desires, his lacking, before meeting Abby (Brooke Adams), a young woman hired for the wheat harvest. Abby tells the farmer that she could have been a dancer, and tells Bill that before the farmer proposed to her she received compliments from many rich men. Bill (Richard Gere), Abby’s lover, who, with his sister Linda (Linda Manz) was also hired for the harvest, wants to make something materialistically substantial out of his life. Bill has lived believing the gambler’s fallacy that one day his luck would change and he confesses this to his character counterpart, the farmer, in one scene. It is not important what the desires of the individual are, only that these wishes have not been fulfilled. Bill wants to own the kinds of things the farmer has; for him it is a visible sign of a buffer against the hard times Bill has always had to endure. The farmer wants Abby so that he may complete his life; he is dying and perhaps knows inside that his life is nothing without loving someone. These desires are understandable and justified until yearned for with a fervor that generates chaos and pain in another person’s life. Abby doesn’t desire with the intensity that the farmer and Bill do. She appears to be satisfied with whatever situation she finds herself in at any moment. Abby only partially wants to be a dancer; she expresses no other aspiration during the course of the film. At the beginning she is picking through scrap heaps in Chicago to help supplement Bill’s income. Abby slips as easily into the lifestyle the farmer provides — although it is not provided by the man she perhaps at first wanted. Of note is the moment when Bill returns to the farm after a long absence and sees Abby on the back porch of the house dancing. Bill at that moment must realize that he has failed to provide for Abby the things he wanted for her and that she has fully accepted the farmer as her husband. Her gradual progression from one conviction to another tells of her flexible nature, her free-flowing spirit.
These desires appear to have an opportunity for success or failure for the three main characters within the microcosm of the wheat field setting. Along with the beauty of the 20,000 acres of wheat field, the farmer’s house stands as a full-sized doll house in the middle of a playground for the imagination; a paradise, a heaven. After the harvest is completed and Abby has decided on the farmer’s invitation to stay, the farmer, Abby, Bill and Linda do more playing than work. During this time the characters chose for the most part to ignore their goals and enjoy the simple life in each other’s company. Linda says, “In my opinion, as long as you’re around, you should have it nice.” Soon, however, the unfulfilling unsavoryness of the situation begins to prey on the minds of both Bill and the farmer. Abby’s happiness is the common concern of both men, though they are unaware of the selfishness of their desires deep inside. Abby becomes an undeclared prize neither can win, and when this becomes apparent the dreamland playground disintegrates.
The main characters of Days of Heaven all have objective correlatives — as Richard Corliss has observed in his review (New Times, 2 October 1978) — and, in fact, each member of the love triangle has more than one. Abby’s obvious correlative is the herd of wild horses seen in the background as she contemplates the proposition Bill has made for her about marrying the farmer. In this sequence Abby is also seen against the background of her elemental correlative: water, as in the scene when Bill bathes Abby’s legs in the river; and when she and Bill go to the river on their midnight tête-à-tête. We must interpret the significance of both correlatives in order to reach an insight into Abby’s nature. What seems immediately characteristic is freedom. Water, in the form of the river, flows on without surcease. It can be directed, as Abby is directed by Bill’s pressure to marry the farmer for his money, but it continues to flow. The wild horses roam on the farm uninhibited.
It would seem that though the farmer is associated with animals (his horse and dogs) it is simply an extension of the farmer’s earthly sensibilities that Linda, whose elemental correlative is earth, recognizes and is sympathetic to. Abby’s freedom becomes apparent in the closing moments of the film as she leaves Linda in a girl’s home and boards a train to points unknown; starting over again seemingly unencumbered by grief for Bill and the farmer.
Bill’s objective correlative is the Machine, which he seems destined to work with all his life. He is often seen working near a steam thresher, or against a background of steam tractors. He is later associated with his bright red motorcycle. Bill’s elemental correlative is obviously fire. It is present when we first see him in the mill as he is stoking a furnace. All the machinery Bill is associated with utilizes fire to function; furnaces, steam tractors, the motorcycle. It is fire that sweeps through the wheat fields, destroying the crop and thus the farmer’s fortune, and this tragedy is foretold in the fire at the dance. Abby agrees to stay on with the farmer and the two of them dance around the fire. We see a shot of Bill watching them through the fire; he turns to leave the dance and a log that has been in the foreground of the shot falls into the fire in a shower of flaming sparks.
In the destruction of the wheat field, it is important to note that it is not instigated by Bill but by exterior aggression. All the fights we see involving Bill are started by others; the steel mill foreman, the sacker who starts a fight by making suggestive comments about Bill and Abby’s relationship, and the farmer setting the big fire with his lantern. This suggests Bill is not an aggressive force himself, but rather has low tolerance for suppressive forces of aggression around him. This makes Bill’s character more worthy of admiration and pity. We feel that Bill should be handled as one handles fire. Note that when Bill and the farmer are fowl hunting and Bill is contemplating shooting the farmer, he cannot quite bring himself to do it. Bill’s correlatives converge in the burning wheat field sequence; one shot shows a tractor slowly plowing through flaming debris apparently as out of control as the fire itself.
The farmer’s objective correlative is the most directly linked physically. His many acres of wheat and his looming house on a nearly flat landscape represent in both real and symbolic terms the manner in which he stands in accomplishment above ordinary men. The farmer’s house symbolically states the farmer’s situation, sitting in the middle of the land of plenty, isolated from people who are his accomplished equals, surrounded by modern-day financial serfs. The house and farm spread are more imposing than the farmer himself; the farmer being, as Linda observes, humbled by his humanity and deep-rooted respect from the soil that provides his wealth. |